測了一下django、flask、bottle、tornado 框架本身最簡單的性能。對django的性能完全無語了。
django、flask、bottle 均使用gunicorn+gevent啟動，單進程，并且關閉DEBUG，請求均只返回一個字符串ok。
tornado直接自己啟動，其他內容一致。
測試軟件為 siege，測試os為cenos6 64位，測試命令為:
siege -c 100 -r 100 -b http://127.0.0.1:5000/
django測試結果為:
Transactions:?????????????? 10000 hits
Availability:????????????? 100.00 %
Elapsed time:?????????????? 18.51 secs
Data transferred:??????????? 0.02 MB
Response time:??????????????? 0.18 secs
Transaction rate:????????? 540.25 trans/sec
Throughput:??????????????? 0.00 MB/sec
Concurrency:?????????????? 99.35
Successful transactions:?????? 10000
Failed transactions:?????????????? 0
Longest transaction:??????????? 0.30
Shortest transaction:??????????? 0.12
django(去掉所有middleware)測試結果為:
Transactions:?????????????? 10000 hits
Availability:????????????? 100.00 %
Elapsed time:?????????????? 12.97 secs
Data transferred:??????????? 0.02 MB
Response time:??????????????? 0.13 secs
Transaction rate:????????? 771.01 trans/sec
Throughput:??????????????? 0.00 MB/sec
Concurrency:?????????????? 99.41
Successful transactions:?????? 10000
Failed transactions:?????????????? 0
Longest transaction:??????????? 0.28
Shortest transaction:??????????? 0.12
flask測試結果為:
Transactions:?????????????? 10000 hits
Availability:????????????? 100.00 %
Elapsed time:??????????????? 5.47 secs
Data transferred:??????????? 0.02 MB
Response time:??????????????? 0.05 secs
Transaction rate:???????? 1828.15 trans/sec
Throughput:??????????????? 0.00 MB/sec
Concurrency:?????????????? 96.25
Successful transactions:?????? 10000
Failed transactions:?????????????? 0
Longest transaction:??????????? 0.11
Shortest transaction:??????????? 0.00
bottle測試結果為:
Transactions:?????????????? 10000 hits
Availability:????????????? 100.00 %
Elapsed time:??????????????? 4.55 secs
Data transferred:??????????? 0.02 MB
Response time:??????????????? 0.04 secs
Transaction rate:???????? 2197.80 trans/sec
Throughput:??????????????? 0.00 MB/sec
Concurrency:?????????????? 96.81
Successful transactions:?????? 10000
Failed transactions:?????????????? 0
Longest transaction:??????????? 0.09
Shortest transaction:??????????? 0.00
tornado測試結果為:
Transactions:?????????????? 10000 hits
Availability:????????????? 100.00 %
Elapsed time:??????????????? 7.06 secs
Data transferred:??????????? 0.02 MB
Response time:??????????????? 0.07 secs
Transaction rate:???????? 1416.43 trans/sec
Throughput:??????????????? 0.00 MB/sec
Concurrency:?????????????? 99.51
Successful transactions:?????? 10000
Failed transactions:?????????????? 0
Longest transaction:??????????? 0.09
Shortest transaction:??????????? 0.01
可見純框架自身的性能為:
bottle > flask > tornado > django
結合實際使用:
tornado 使用了異步驅動，所以在寫業務代碼時如果稍有同步耗時性能就會急劇下降；
bottle需要自己實現的東西太多，加上之后不知道性能會怎樣；
flask性能稍微差點，但周邊的支持已經很豐富了；
django就不說了，性能已經沒法看了，唯一的好處就是開發的架子都已經搭好，開發速度快很多
因為最近正在為一個項目選型發愁，所以就測了一下，記錄在此吧。
PS: 2014-6-23 使用 centos6 64位 重新進行了測試，得出與生產環境更匹配的結果，并修改了文章。
更多文章、技術交流、商務合作、聯系博主
微信掃碼或搜索：z360901061
微信掃一掃加我為好友
QQ號聯系： 360901061
您的支持是博主寫作最大的動力，如果您喜歡我的文章，感覺我的文章對您有幫助，請用微信掃描下面二維碼支持博主2元、5元、10元、20元等您想捐的金額吧，狠狠點擊下面給點支持吧，站長非常感激您！手機微信長按不能支付解決辦法：請將微信支付二維碼保存到相冊，切換到微信，然后點擊微信右上角掃一掃功能，選擇支付二維碼完成支付。
【本文對您有幫助就好】元
